Form follows ……… emotion

Recently my architecture firm EDGES sent in a design entry for a commercial building complex. Before starting on the conceptual design of the building, we had the eternal discussion common to all designers of Form and function. I re-write this article which I had written a few months back but now modified by my own experiences to explore both sides of the argument.

EDGES design entry

EDGES design entry

Form follows ……… function is a principle associated with modern architecture and industrial design in the 20th century. It was the late 19th century architect Louis H. Sullivan who coined this phrase “form (ever) follows function” in 1896 in his article The tall office building artistically considered. Sullivan developed the tall steel skyscraper in Chicago during this very time. His assistant Frank Lloyd Wright later adopted the same principle in a slightly different form.

This phrase became a battle-cry of Modernist Architects after 1930s which implied that all decorative elements (ornamental) were superfluous and the building design should be a direct reflection for the function it has been designed, making it simplistic and contemporary to look at. It is a belief very close to “Less is more” and which sheds all elements used for ornamentation of elements.

Nearly a century later Hartmut Esslinger (a German-American industrial designer) on the lines of this famous maxim re-coined it into his design principle “form follows emotion”. Esslinger is known for his ground-breaking designs from Apple, Lufthansa Airlines, Siemens, Motorola and many more. Speaking from a context of product design he says, “brand position is what counts, and brand goes back to the emotional content of products”. The future is in personalization and we as designers get hints on this every day.

Frank Gehry’s design for Guggenheim museum in Bilbao is a perfect example of form following an individual’s emotion. Every owner or an architect has an emotional connect with its building, so it is natural for a building to be a confluence of the emotions of the architect and owners.

Frank Gehry's Guggenheim Museum Bilbao

Frank Gehry’s Guggenheim Museum Bilbao

As for our design entry we tried our best to merge Form, Function & Emotion together and everyone who was part of the design team had their own perception about the building’s architecture. Ultimately a building does reflect the personal taste of the designer & the owner.

Form or Function?

Form or Function?

Our entry has finally been shortlisted in the top 3 entries and we like to believe that the building “form did follow our emotion”.

Advertisements

About askmaverick

Architect, Entreprenuer, Traveller, Movie buff, Amateur Photographer, Foodie .... do I need to say more!
This entry was posted in Architecture, Design and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Form follows ……… emotion

  1. aninfinite says:

    Nice one Maneck..

  2. sanjay austa says:

    Hey great to see your blog Manek. Very interesting post . I definitely agree form should follow emotion. The “less is more” sort of design I feel is good for furniture or window – door design etc. not for buildings. That way all buildings will look the same- like rectangular blocks. In Chicago the older “ornamental” buildings were of more interest to me because they also carried some motifs of the age, some cultural inferences etc, some vestige of history. Aqua the building by Jeanne Gang was certainly interesting as were the “corn cobs”- Marina City complex by Bertrang Goldberg. The tour guides on the hop on hop off buses said that one of these architects had said that nothing in nature is a straight line so why should buildings be like that. I forgot which architect among these two said this. Maybe you know who . I agree with that completely and its similar to form follows emotion philosophy.

    • askmaverick says:

      Sanjay great words spoken and I am glad you liked the aqua building by Jean Gang, infact I had tried something similar for a hotel once (but never got the project 🙂 However, most of the great buildings I have seen or are famous have been a result of the whims and fancies of the architects (which we intelligently call Design Philosophy). Sir Winston Churchill said, “We shape our buildings: thereafter they shape us” … exactly the point I was trying to make and how the buildings impact the society. Well, I hope to see your pictures from Chicago and will let you know about the source of the quote soon. Thanks for commenting.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s